No Consensus on Territory After US-Ukraine Talks Amid Ongoing Conflict
Berlin, Germany – U.S. President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy concluded a 48‑hour round of negotiations on Monday with no agreement reached on the territorial status of Ukraine’s eastern and southern regions. The talks, which included European mediators, failed to determine whether Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson will be returned, permanently occupied, or placed under a demilitarised “free economic zone.” While progress on security guarantees was noted, the core question of sovereignty remains unresolved, raising doubts about the viability of an immediate peace settlement.
Background/Context
Russia’s full-scale invasion launched in February 2022 has turned Ukraine into a battleground of high intensity, forcing the West to grapple with both military and diplomatic solutions. The United States, under Trump’s leadership, has positioned itself as a central mediator, hoping to broker a deal that will curtail further escalation and ensure a durable ceasefire. By December, almost 90% of the contentious issues were supposedly negotiated, yet the territorial disputes that underpin the conflict proved stubborn. The absence of consensus underscores the deep-rooted differences between Kyiv and Moscow regarding the status of annexed and occupied areas.
Key Developments
The Berlin talks focused primarily on three pillars:
- Security Guarantees – The U.S. offered robust NATO‑style protections, contingent on a formal commitment from Ukraine to halt offensive operations in occupied zones.
- Territorial Status – Zelenskyy reiterated that the Donbas (Donetsk and Luhansk) cannot be recognized as part of Russian territory, either de jure or de facto, and rejected a purely demilitarised corridor under Moscow’s control.
- Future Negotiations – Both sides agreed to schedule additional meetings, with Ukrainian delegates slated to travel to Washington in the coming weeks for further talks with Trump’s team.
Zelenskyy conveyed optimism about the security angle, noting a “significant step forward” in securing U.S. guarantees. Meanwhile, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov lauded the progress, claiming Ukraine and Russia were “on the verge” of a diplomatic solution. Yet the lack of a shared understanding of territorial sovereignty remains a critical impasse.
Impact Analysis
For international students and scholars residing in Eastern Europe, the continued uncertainty poses direct risks. The ongoing exchange of drones and artillery rockets has led to a surge in civilian casualties and destabilised regional economies. Universities in Kharkiv and Luhansk have reported class cancellations, while foreign nationals fear a sudden escalation could jeopardise visa statuses and safety. The unresolved territorial disputes also threaten the long‑term planning of diaspora communities, affecting property rights, inheritance laws, and the recognition of civil documents issued under provisional administration.
Expert Insights/Tips
Legal Experts advise students holding study visas in Ukraine to keep emergency contacts updated and to register with their embassies. They recommend maintaining copies of enrollment confirmations and financial statements, as they may be needed for rapid evacuation or diplomatic protection. For those planning future education in the region, it is prudent to investigate the political stability of potential host cities and to stay informed through both Ukrainian and U.S. diplomatic channels. Academics focusing on conflict studies should monitor official releases from the U.S. National Security Council, as these will outline any shifts in the U.S. strategy and the potential reorientation of security guarantees.
Looking Ahead
Trump’s administration is positioned to play a decisive role in the next phase of negotiations. The announcement of a potential Christmas truce, proposed by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, could provide breathing space for diplomatic breakthroughs, but the absence of a territorial settlement may prolong hostilities. The Kremlin’s insistence that Ukraine withdraw from Donetsk and Luhansk in exchange for the cessation of fighting remains a sticking point. As the U.S. pivots toward military support for Ukraine, it is unclear whether the security guarantees offered will suffice to tip the balance toward a peaceful resolution. The international community will vigilantly watch for the continuation of drone attacks, especially over civilian areas, as a testament to the fragility of the current ceasefire.
Reach out to us for personalized consultation based on your specific requirements.